My defining questions are: 1) How does one define immersion, especially in the context of both Moby-Dick and digital culture? 2) How does one become immersed in the digital world?
Immersion is about belief in what you really think is out there versus what is actually there.
The first instance in the book that comes to mind is on page 278: Ishmael's observation that a sinking whale corpse is regarded in logs of merchantmen as shoals and rocks that ought to be avoided. He also observes that this is how people in general tend to think.
Being LDS, when we think of the word immersion, we think of baptism. However, in Moby-Dick and in the digital world, rather than coming up from something, immersion in this means going into something and becoming part of it. For instance, on page 435- Ahab "baptizes" his harpoon in the blood of pagans, in the name of the devil. This may be equated to his assuming an avatar or identity--What identity do we immerse ourselves in in the digital world? Do we represent ourselves or adopt a "persona"?
This Smithsonian article suggested by Dr. Burton leads me to a book about information technology, life,a nd ideas, called The Information: A History, A Theory, A Flood, by James Gleick. I will look for this at the library. The ideas in this article go back to page 278 and the orthodoxy quote. And as a side note,
this is why the LDS Church has a centralized hierarchy, manuals, and web tools so that all of the members get the same message and to prevent the ideas about the gospel from being perpetuated incorrectly.
So this is my working thesis statement and a rough outline of the ideas I want to write about:
To Ishmael, there is an entire ocean of ideas and knowledge to follow and explore, but Ahab's downfall come from refusing to open himself to this diversity (better word?) and immersing himself in the narrow idea that he must take revenge on the White Whale.
- There is an entire ocean of ideas and knowledge to follow and explore
- the digital universe exposes us to this
- creating online profiles and avatars
- Ishmael signing the ship's articles? (62)
- by signing up for a service you allow messages and updates to be communicated to you--you join a larger world when joining the internet; but, in reverse, Ishmael was joining a smaller world.
- by interacting with others online
- by "going places" within the digital world
- Ishmael spends the course of Moby-Dick trying to comprehend the vastness of the ocean and the manifold aspects of whale science and whaling;
- he immerses himself in the avatar of the Adventurous Sailor "Ishmael" the outcast, the one who wanders around and in wandering, explores and sees many things
- Immersion as place: he wants to go everywhere and see everything
- Immersion as belief: he knows the danger of limiting ideas; he knows the benefits of knowing what's out there. (page 1--when he gets stuck in a rut on shore it's time to go to sea for a change of scenery)
- you can't stick yourself to one idea because that's the nature of ideas: they aren't always what they seem! like genes, ideas (scientifically labeled memes) want to spread and change (this was in the Smithsonian article). Ideas are never stable, they change as they are transmitted, so one idea shared by one person can be altered by someone else and completely misunderstood as it is continually shared. What Ishmael knows to be a whale's corpse is a reef to a merchant ship that runs across it.
- There are dangers in becoming limited to a single idea
- there are multiple instances in the book where he is described as standing in a pivot-hole on his peg leg: the peg leg IS his monomania, it is his rut, it is his revenge
- Ahab immerses himself to the narrow idea of revenge, separating himself from the wonders of the ocean and the happiness he could have had in the world at large
- identifies/immerses himself only with his lust for revenge (monomaniac)
- not to make a living off the sea and all of its treasures, but to hunt for the one thing he wants and ignore the rest, including the danger (find book quotes about this)
- Immersion as place--Ahab is only ever in one place, in one perspective
- Immersion as belief: he wants to kill the whale, he thinks if he kills the white whale he will have revenge and revenge will bring him....? The satisfaction of getting even. This isn't even getting even, because whales don't have legs.
This looks great. You've done a lot of research and thinking with your subject. Thanks for posting this, because I saw you found a great Smithsonian article so I followed that link to see if I could find another article pertaining to my subject and found something really helpful. I love this - we're all helping each other out whether or not we intend to!
ReplyDeleteI find this a really interesting topic. It was actually the first thing that I blogged about. I claimed that we are so immersed in our digital culture that we don't even know it. I referenced David Foster Wallace's speech called Water. I am intrigued by the idea of exploring what immersion actually is and its connotations. In your post, immersion even comes across as a process that limits your mind to a single idea, such as Ahab and his fixation on killing Moby Dick. I think you can go in a lot of different directions, so nice job researching!
ReplyDeleteThanks for the lead. I'm posting the link for reference:
Deletehttp://teamishmael.blogspot.com/2013/09/humanizing-digital-age.html
This looks really great! I guess the one question I would have for your thesis statement though would be to consider the flipside. Ahab certainly is not open to diversity or considering pursuing anything but the whale, but doesn't he need to be at least somewhat focused in his pursuit? Likewise, don't we need to have certain areas of the digital world that we are interested in so that we can really develop in those areas? Maybe this is just coming from my own feelings of being overwhelmed by how MUCH information is out there, and how it literally would be impossible for me to explore and understand everything that is out there. Anyhow, might be something useful to consider!
ReplyDeletethank you for the counter-point.
Delete